Re: More /.{I->-1} craziness
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg106528] Re: More /.{I->-1} craziness
- From: AES <siegman at stanford.edu>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 03:20:36 -0500 (EST)
- Organization: Stanford University
- References: <200912300915.EAA17299@smc.vnet.net> <hhhmn8$o9t$1@smc.vnet.net>
In article <hhhmn8$o9t$1 at smc.vnet.net>, Leonid Shifrin <lshifr at gmail.com> wrote: > It would perhaps be nice if such > cases were more systematically documented, but they have nothing to do with > bugs, as Daniel Lichtblau and many others already explained. > > Hope this helps. > > Regards, > Leonid Thanks for shared reaction on documentation (though I don't think that problem will be solved soon). I'm not sure I ever called this a bug -- but in any case "product defect" is a characterization I'll stick with.