Re: I'm puzzled by drastic truncation of y-axis in DateListLogPlot
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg115427] Re: I'm puzzled by drastic truncation of y-axis in DateListLogPlot
- From: DrMajorBob <btreat1 at austin.rr.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 00:32:13 -0500 (EST)
That sounds as if Full would be less "full" than All. But the opposite is
true for the OP's example.
Bobby
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 10:48:36 -0600, Darren Glosemeyer
<darreng at wolfram.com> wrote:
> The fact that All does not show all the points is a bug in the log-based
> plotting code which I think will be fixed in the next release.
>
> I get confused about the difference between All and Full as well. I'm
> told by the developer of PlotRange that PlotRange->Full uses the
> PlotRange->All result and then does some clipping. The clipping is
> similar (at least in concept and perhaps even in the internal code) to a
> applying a RegionFunction. So there is a difference between All and
> Full, but it's somewhat subtle (more subtle than I completely
> understand).
>
> Darren Glosemeyer
> Wolfram Research
>
> On 1/10/2011 1:39 AM, DrMajorBob wrote:
>> Criminy! If PlotRange -> All means "all points are included", why do we
>> need "PlotRange -> Full"?
>>
>> What's the difference, other than "All" not meaning ALL?
>>
>> Bobby
>>
>> On Sun, 09 Jan 2011 22:45:23 -0600, Syd Geraghty<sydgeraghty at me.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Bob,
>>>
>>> Sorry about my mistake ... I was experimenting trying to make it work
>>> OK
>>> and tried both
>>>
>>> 1 PlotRange->All
>>>
>>> 2 PlotRange->Full
>>>
>>> and it was PlotRange->Full that actually worked OK.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers .... Syd
>>>
>>> Syd Geraghty B.Sc, M.Sc.
>>>
>>> sydgeraghty at mac.com
>>>
>>> Mathematica 8.0 for Mac OS X x86 (64-bit) (November 6, 2010)
>>> MacOS X V 10.6.5 Snow Leopard
>>> MacBook Pro 2.33 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo 2GB RAM
>>>
>>> On Jan 9, 2011, at 7:12 PM, DrMajorBob wrote:
>>>
>>>> I tried PlotRange->All, and it made no difference. (Version 8.)
>>>>
>>>> Bobby
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, 09 Jan 2011 01:16:44 -0600, Syd Geraghty<sydgeraghty at me.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi James,
>>>>>
>>>>> Its not you ....
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Just add PlotRange->All
>>>>>
>>>>> to the options of DateListLogPlot and all will be well.
>>>>>
>>>>> Its a bug / Feature that should be reported.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers .... Syd
>>>>>
>>>>> Syd Geraghty B.Sc, M.Sc.
>>>>>
>>>>> sydgeraghty at mac.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Mathematica 8.0 for Mac OS X x86 (64-bit) (November 6, 2010)
>>>>> MacOS X V 10.6.5 Snow Leopard
>>>>> MacBook Pro 2.33 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo 2GB RAM
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jan 7, 2011, at 1:13 AM, James Stein wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I ran into some curious behavior I can't explain. I have two rather
>>>>>> benign
>>>>>> lists of numbers, of equal length. When either is plotted alone, all
>>>>>> goes as
>>>>>> expected; and when they are plotted together, all goes *almost* as
>>>>>> expected. Dropping the last two or more values makes the plotting
>>>>>> normal,
>>>>>> but dropping only one, or none, the y axis extends up only to 5
>>>>>> (instead of
>>>>>> to 20); and the dropped values are not near the extreme values.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you copy the below into a cell and evaluate it, the gist of what
>>>>>> I've
>>>>>> said above will, I hope, be clear. Have I done something stupid?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (* d is a list of dates; a and b are data; we combine 'd'
>>>>>> with a and b to form two lists for DateListLogPlot: *)
>>>>>> d={{2007,8,31},{2007,9,28},{2007,10,31},{2007,11,30},{2007,12,31},{2008,1,31},{2008,2,29},{2008,3,31},{2008,4,30},{2008,5,30},{2008,6,30},{2008,7,31},{2008,8,29},{2008,9,30},{2008,10,31},{2008,11,28},{2008,12,31},{2009,1,30},{2009,2,27},{2009,3,31},{2009,4,30},{2009,5,29},{2009,6,30},{2009,7,31},{2009,8,31},{2009,9,30},{2009,10,30},{2009,11,30},{2009,12,31},{2010,1,29},{2010,2,26},{2010,3,31},{2010,4,30},{2010,5,28},{2010,6,30},{2010,7,30},{2010,8,31},{2010,9,30},{2010,10,29},{2010,11,30},{2010,12,31},{2011,1,4}};
>>>>>> a={20.78,21.3,18.5,16.11,13.58,10.04,6.74,5.88,7.63,9.32,8.83,7.84,8.04,5.07,2.41,1.94,1.48,1.64,1.82,2.04,2.4,2.88,2.46,2.05,1.74,2.1,1.48,1.81,1.97,1.67,1.79,2.13,2.35,2.52,2.12,2.34,2.23,2.6,2.5,2.38,2.6,2.64};
>>>>>> b={1.43,1.45,1.48,1.50,1.52,1.55,1.57,1.59,1.62,1.64,1.67,1.696,1.712,1.75,1.77,1.80,1.83,1.86,1.88,1.91,1.94,1.97,2.00,2.03,2.1,2.10,2.13,2.16,2.20,2.23,2.26,2.30,2.33,2.36,2.40,2.44,2.48,2.52,2.55,2.59,2.63,2.64};
>>>>>> a=Transpose[{d,a}];
>>>>>> b=Transpose[{d,b}];
>>>>>> c={a,b};
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (* a and b can be plotted alone; but when plotted together
>>>>>> we get drastic truncation at the top of the log axis: *)
>>>>>> DateListLogPlot[a,Joined->True,PlotLabel->"a alone"]
>>>>>> DateListLogPlot[b,Joined->True,PlotLabel->"b alone"]
>>>>>> DateListLogPlot[c,Joined->True,PlotLabel->"a and b"]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (* the drastic truncation occurs suddenly; if at least two rightmost
>>>>>> values
>>>>>> are truncated, all is OK: *)
>>>>>> x=Length[d];
>>>>>> Table[DateListLogPlot[{Take[a,n],Take[b,n]},Joined->True,PlotLabel->ToString[n],ImageSize->Small],{n,x-3,x}]
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> DrMajorBob at yahoo.com
>>
>
--
DrMajorBob at yahoo.com