MathGroup Archive 2011

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Series[log[x], {x, 0, 3}]

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg119148] Re: Series[log[x], {x, 0, 3}]
  • From: Bill Rowe <readnews at sbcglobal.net>
  • Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 06:24:46 -0400 (EDT)

On 5/22/11 at 6:55 AM, hszhao.cn at gmail.com (Hongsheng Zhao) wrote:

>On 05/21/2011 01:06 PM, DrMajorBob wrote:
>>Series[Log@x, {x, 1, 3}]

>What does the @ sign mean in the above formula?

Log@x means Log[x]. Both notations do the same thing.

>Why not you use the following form:

>Series[Log[x], {x, 1, 3}]

While I cannot speak for DrMajorBob, my reason for using the
notation f@x rather than f[x] is primarily readability. Constrast

Sqrt[Abs[Sin[x]]]

with Sqrt[Abs@Sin@x]

Both do the same, but for me, it is easier to see what the
second form does than the first. Deeply nested brackets are more
difficult for me to read. And there is the additional factor of
less typing required for the second form.



  • Prev by Date: A problem with NIntegrate
  • Next by Date: Re: Maximize a single variable and solve for the rest
  • Previous by thread: Re: Series[log[x], {x, 0, 3}]
  • Next by thread: Re: Series[log[x], {x, 0, 3}]