MathGroup Archive 2011

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: ODE system - shooting for a terminal point

  • To: mathgroup at
  • Subject: [mg121173] Re: ODE system - shooting for a terminal point
  • From: David Bailey <dave at>
  • Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 03:29:26 -0400 (EDT)
  • Delivered-to:
  • References: <j3l17d$btv$>

On 31/08/2011 11:08, The Mighty Algernon wrote:
> Hi,
> I wonder if you could help me.
> I have a system of ODE in which I have to figure out the initial
> conditions of part of the differential equations. I managed to do this
> by the shooting method by writing the system as a function of the
> initial conditions.
> For example solution[yini_,zini_]:=NDSolve[......
> then I used FindRoot on the set of terminal restrictions to find yini
> and zini (these are the initial conditions). This procedure worked
> although it is terribly sensitive to the first guesses on the FindRoot
> and some results I get are obviously wrong. But this is something I
> can refine.
> Now I have a similar goal but the variable I'm trying to guess is not
> an initial condition of a differential equation but the terminal value
> of the range of the exogenous variable. For example,
> If I have a system of 2 ODE , y[x] and z[x], I want to know for {x,
> 0,xtarget} what is my xtarget. Think of x as time and I want to figure
> when is the terminal time of the system such that some restrictions at
> the terminal time are met.
> My first ideia was to adapt the above procedure, writing
> solution[xtarget_]:=NDSolve[......
> then giving the set of restrictions and then using FindRoot to get
> xtarget, but Mathematica gives me an error message the xtarget is not
> a real value.
> My question is :
>   Is it possible to adapt the procedure outlined above, meaning that
> I'm just doing some kind of error here (that I'll have to correct), or
> Mathematica does not handle this kind of problems directly in NDSolve
> and I have to write some sort of loop with ever more refined guesses
> for xtarget?
> My best regards
> Joao Pereira

I think what you are asking, boils down to the problem of how to find a 
root of f[x] when f[x], itself faults when x has no value - e.g. because 
it contains an NDSolve.

The solution is to wrap f[x] in something that will prevent evaluation 
unless x is numeric - e.g.


Now use g[x] inside FindRoot.

David Bailey

  • Prev by Date: Re: Difference table via DifferenceDelta[ ]. Why do I need two Table[ ] calls?
  • Next by Date: Re: Problem with complex integration in Mathematica 7.0.1
  • Previous by thread: Re: Assembling PDFs into a PDF document?
  • Next by thread: Re: ODE system - shooting for a terminal point