Re: Quit versus Clear["Global`*"]
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg121253] Re: Quit versus Clear["Global`*"]
- From: DrMajorBob <btreat1 at austin.rr.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 03:57:23 -0400 (EDT)
- Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
- References: <201109042206.SAA21533@smc.vnet.net>
- Reply-to: drmajorbob at yahoo.com
I, on the other hand, never saw Quit[] until this thread began. I suppose it figures that if Quit kills the kernel, then also Quit[any arguments or none] might also kill the kernel. (The other way 'round doesn't necessarily "figure", on the other hand.) Bobby On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 07:44:17 -0500, Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz at mimuw.edu.pl> wrote: > Actually (as far as I can tell) Quit is undocumented but Quit[] is: > > ?Quit > Quit[] terminates a Mathematica kernel session. > > I thought you had made a mistake but I tired just Quit (without the > brackets) and was surprised (after all these years!) to see it work. I > am wondering if there are more cases like this? > > Andrzej Kozlowski > > On 5 Sep 2011, at 13:06, DrMajorBob wrote: > >> No. For that, you need: >> >> Quit >> >> Bobby >> >> On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 17:06:32 -0500, Themis Matsoukas <tmatsoukas at me.com> >> wrote: >> >>> So, if I use ClearAll["Global`*"] at the beginning of a notebook and >>> execute all the cells, is it the same as running on a fresh kernel? >>> >>> Themis >>> >> >> >> -- >> DrMajorBob at yahoo.com >> > -- DrMajorBob at yahoo.com
- References:
- Re: Quit versus Clear["Global`*"]
- From: Themis Matsoukas <tmatsoukas@me.com>
- Re: Quit versus Clear["Global`*"]