Re: Compilation: Avoiding inlining
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg121560] Re: Compilation: Avoiding inlining
- From: David Bailey <dave at removedbailey.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 06:07:41 -0400 (EDT)
- Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
- References: <201109160946.FAA12301@smc.vnet.net> <j4vana$dal$1@smc.vnet.net>
On 16/09/2011 12:08, Oliver Ruebenkoenig wrote: > On Fri, 16 Sep 2011, DmitryG wrote: > >> Here is a program with (* Definition of the equations *) made one- >> step, that performs the same as in my previous post.................... I tried pasting your example into Mathematica, but unfortunately there seems to be a variable 'x' which is undefined - presumably some input data. It might be worth posting a complete example, so that people can explore how to get decent performance. Error: Part::partd: "Part specification x[[1]] is longer than depth of object." David Bailey http://www.dbaileyconsultancy.co.uk
- References:
- Re: Compilation: Avoiding inlining
- From: DmitryG <einschlag@gmail.com>
- Re: Compilation: Avoiding inlining