Services & ResourcesWolfram ForumsMathGroup Archive

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Re: Could someone else verify that an example from the Numerical

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg127327] Re: Could someone else verify that an example from the Numerical
• From: W Craig Carter <ccarter at MIT.EDU>
• Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 01:31:05 -0400 (EDT)
• Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
• Delivered-to: mathgroup-newout@smc.vnet.net
• Delivered-to: mathgroup-newsend@smc.vnet.net
• References: <jttv31$gut$1@smc.vnet.net> <20120716090008.73A2A6828@smc.vnet.net>

Thank you Nasser, Syd, and Roland,
I had to type it in---I couldn't copy and paste from the pdf.

However, I don't think it would *ever*  occurred to me that the problem =
was that the Integer tau had to be a Real.  I'm happy to have the =
resolution, but very surprised by the nature of the resolution!


W Craig Carter
Professor of Materials Science, MIT



On Jul 16, , at Mon Jul 16, 12 @5:00 AM, Nasser M. Abbasi wrote:

> On 7/15/2012 3:30 AM, W Craig Carter wrote:
>
>
> Ah! But you changed the code from the pdf file !
>
> You wrote
>
>>    {tau, 0, 20, 5}], 2]]
>>
>
> Notice the limit you have on the tau. You wrote
>
>       {tau, 0, 20, 5}
>
> while it should be
>
>       {tau, 0, 20., 5.}

• References:
  • Re: Could someone else verify that an example from the Numerical
    • From: "Nasser M. Abbasi" <nma@12000.org>