       Re: Putting a Test or Condition on the Right-Hand Side of a Function

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg127474] Re: Putting a Test or Condition on the Right-Hand Side of a Function
• From: Bill Rowe <readnews at sbcglobal.net>
• Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 04:59:36 -0400 (EDT)
• Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
• Delivered-to: mathgroup-newout@smc.vnet.net
• Delivered-to: mathgroup-newsend@smc.vnet.net

```On 7/26/12 at 3:35 AM, gregory.lypny at videotron.ca (Gregory Lypny)
wrote:

>I have a simple function that displays the integer part of a real
>number if the fraction part is less than a millionth.

>dropDecimal[x_] := If[FractionalPart[x] < .000001, IntegerPart[x],
>x]

>In trying to learn more about functional programming, I was wondering
>whether there is a way to put the condition or test on the right-hand
>side of the function.

You could do this as follows:

In:= dropDecimal[x_] :=
IntegerPart[x] /; FractionalPart[x] < .000001
dropDecimal[x_] := x /; FractionalPart[x] > .000001

In:= dropDecimal[N[56 + 10^(-6)]]

Out= 56

In:= dropDecimal[N[56 + 10^(-4)]]

Out= 56.0001

But I think this would be a much better definition for this function:

In:= Clear[dropDecimal];
dropDecimal[x_] := Round[x, .000001]

In:= dropDecimal[N[56 + 10^(-6)]]

Out= 56.

In:= dropDecimal[N[56 + 10^(-4)]]

Out= 56.0001

However, this isn't quite the same since the output isn't an
exact value and the use of Round means something just slightly
less than the threshold gets rounded up rather than truncated.

```

• Prev by Date: Re: Countur/Density plot on sphere
• Next by Date: Subject: Re: Using Fit to interpolate data
• Previous by thread: Re: Putting a Test or Condition on the Right-Hand Side of a Function
• Next by thread: Re: Contour plot labels with higher precision