MathGroup Archive 2012

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Euclidean distance of all pairwise combinations (redundants)

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg128693] Re: Euclidean distance of all pairwise combinations (redundants)
  • From: Ray Koopman <koopman at sfu.ca>
  • Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 03:56:58 -0500 (EST)
  • Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
  • Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@wolfram.com
  • Delivered-to: mathgroup-newout@smc.vnet.net
  • Delivered-to: mathgroup-newsend@smc.vnet.net
  • References: <k7ve05$s08$1@smc.vnet.net>

On Nov 13, 10:35 pm, Jesse Pisel <jessepi... at gmail.com> wrote:
> I have been having a tough time trying to figure out how to include all red undant pairwise combinations in my results for the euclidean distance between a set of points. I have a set of points with xy coordinates and want the euclidean distance between each point including the point and itself. So if my points in xy space are list = {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}} for example, I want the distance from {1, 1} to {1, 1}, {1, 1} to {2, 2}, and {2, 2} to {3, 3} etc. for each point for a total of 9 distances all together. The EuclideanDistance function removes the redundant distances that I want retained in the results. I have been using this code just to play with data but would like to be able to expand up to 500+ points:
>
> list = {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}}
> EuclideanDistance @@@ Subsets[list, {2}]
>
> Any ideas on how to get the euclidean distance between all the points including redundants and self references?

If your lists are long then it will be faster to use

Needs["HierarchicalClustering`"]

Flatten@DistanceMatrix[list, DistanceFunction -> EuclideanDistance]



  • Prev by Date: correlation function
  • Next by Date: Re: Plotting a series of Roots
  • Previous by thread: Re: Euclidean distance of all pairwise combinations (redundants)
  • Next by thread: System of second-order nonlinear ordinary differential equations