MathGroup Archive 2013

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: NDSolve differences between mathematica 8 and 9

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg129575] Re: NDSolve differences between mathematica 8 and 9
  • From: Bert RAM Aerts <bert.ram.aerts at gmail.com>
  • Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 01:37:35 -0500 (EST)
  • Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
  • Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@wolfram.com
  • Delivered-to: mathgroup-newout@smc.vnet.net
  • Delivered-to: mathgroup-newsend@smc.vnet.net
  • References: <kdqjlh$3d4$1@smc.vnet.net>

On Thursday, January 24, 2013 7:17:21 AM UTC+1, Teresa wrote:

> where i is the imaginary number, and on both I had a new window to work on, with nothing having been done previously on it. 

Please use capital I for the imaginary unit.
Then I got a solution for your equation with
Mathematica 9.0 x86_64 on Linux Mageia 2 x86_64. 




  • Prev by Date: Differentiating Interpolation Functions -- "Delaunay" Interpolation
  • Next by Date: Question about Thread & Total
  • Previous by thread: Re: NDSolve differences between mathematica 8 and 9
  • Next by thread: Re: NDSolve differences between mathematica 8 and 9