Re: What is f[1]? Advanced question

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg131322] Re: What is f[1]? Advanced question
• From: David Bailey <dave at removedbailey.co.uk>
• Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 04:13:33 -0400 (EDT)
• Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
• Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@wolfram.com
• Delivered-to: mathgroup-outx@smc.vnet.net
• Delivered-to: mathgroup-newsendx@smc.vnet.net
• References: <20130626011408.DC7E86A2B@smc.vnet.net> <kqdshl\$n34\$1@smc.vnet.net> <kqh3u0\$2im\$1@smc.vnet.net>

```On 27/06/2013 11:25, amannucci wrote:
> Thanks. This is very helpful. I remain puzzled by this:
>
> u // FullForm
> FullForm[Symbol["u"]]
> FullForm[Unevaluated[Symbol["u"]]
>
> FullForm[{1, 2, 3}]
>
> In other words, Head and FullForm seem consist for the list, and inconsistent for the variable u. u's full form is just, literally "u", not Symbol["u"]. But the list's FullForm starts with "List". Head of Symbol["u"] is not Symbol, but "u". What gives?
>
>
I don't think there is too much mystery here - FullForm would simply be
too clumsy if it expanded symbols into Symbol constructs. As it is,
FullForm is incredibly useful.

I wish there was also a variant that did not evaluate its argument. True
one can write:

expression //Hold//FullForm

but the expression gets contaminated with Hold.

David Bailey
http://www.dbaileyconsultancy.co.uk

```

• Prev by Date: Syzygy module computation
• Next by Date: Re: Rearranging the Terms of a Polynomial