Re: updating a simulation within Manipulate.
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg130090] Re: updating a simulation within Manipulate.
- From: Waclaw Kusnierczyk <waku at idi.ntnu.no>
- Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 16:46:48 -0500 (EST)
- Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
- Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@wolfram.com
- Delivered-to: mathgroup-newout@smc.vnet.net
- Delivered-to: mathgroup-newsend@smc.vnet.net
- References: <20130308035142.51AD66799@smc.vnet.net> <5139E091.8000909@idi.ntnu.no> <5BBB104C-71B2-4AAA-9076-12DD94A35694@MIT.EDU>
On 03/08/2013 02:30 PM, W Craig Carter wrote: > Thanks Waclwaw, > That is informative; I'm going to have to read the docs about ScheduledTask[]s. > > My "real" example is quite a bit more involved---I have a Manipulate buried inside a Manipulate. I am not looking at random walks per se, but that was an example I cooked up which was simple enough to illustrate my question. I think this is the preferred method for asking questions in the group? (As long as one doesn't make the silly typos that I am prone to..). Yes, I'd say reproducible, representative examples with all that's necessary but nothing that's not are the best way to illustrate questions -- and get responses. Best, vQ
- References:
- updating a simulation within Manipulate.
- From: W Craig Carter <ccarter@MIT.EDU>
- updating a simulation within Manipulate.