Re: Redudant code for style purposes?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg132583] Re: Redudant code for style purposes?
- From: andymhancock at gmail.com
- Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 05:27:30 -0400 (EDT)
- Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
- Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@wolfram.com
- Delivered-to: mathgroup-outx@smc.vnet.net
- Delivered-to: mathgroup-newsendx@smc.vnet.net
- References: <lidla5$la$1@smc.vnet.net>
On Sunday, April 13, 2014 5:27:33 AM UTC-4, andymh... at gmail.com wrote:
> The Mathematica Cookbook has an example:
>
> array = RandomReal[{0, 10}, 20]
>
> Table[List @@ array[[i ;; i + 1]], {i, 1, 16}]
>
> I'm new to Mathematica, but to me, the "List @@" seems redundant.
> The statements give the same results if I remove it. Is there a
> reason for this, either functionally or for clarity?
Murray, Bob,
Thanks for confirming that "List @@" is redundant, and for the
alternative statements for achieving the same thing. I am not going
to echo your examples here. Instead, I am going to assume that
Grouples is simply delayed in showing them here, and that they will
appear shortly.