MathGroup Archive 2014

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: For 2014?

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg132178] Re: For 2014?
  • From: Ulrich Arndt <ulrich.arndt at data2knowledge.de>
  • Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 02:48:52 -0500 (EST)
  • Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
  • Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@wolfram.com
  • Delivered-to: mathgroup-outx@smc.vnet.net
  • Delivered-to: mathgroup-newsendx@smc.vnet.net
  • References: <20131224071749.C3F1A69D5@smc.vnet.net> <3688DC0E-CE14-47F1-B93B-5BFA875C59E3@data2knowledge.de> <20131226112449.4994F6A09@smc.vnet.net> <644455E9-F8F1-491C-9EFE-1198A90B8FED@wolfram.com> <la606o$faj$1@smc.vnet.net> <20140107075437.D0DF569ED@smc.vnet.net>

Yes, this is much faster - 5 times on my machine.
Problem is that we get 141 chars even if we replace the re by b ;-).

But can someone explain the reason for the huge processing time difference?

Ulrich


Am 07.01.2014 um 08:54 schrieb Costa Bravo:

> Ulrich Arndt wrote:
>>
>> 
l=Range[9];r=StringJoin[Riffle[ToString/@l,#]]&/@Tuples[{"+","-","*","/",""},8];Grid[{#,Extract[r,Position[ToExpression/@r,#]]}&/@(l+2010)]
>>
>  faster
>
> 
l=Range[9];re=ToExpression[r=StringJoin[Riffle[ToString/@l,#]]&/@Tuples[{"+","-","*","/",""},8]];Grid[{#,Extract[r,Position[re,#]]}&/@(l+2010)]
>
> --
>  Costa
>




  • Prev by Date: Re: Elasticity functions for Bezier and rectangular forms
  • Next by Date: Compact formulation of array of constraints
  • Previous by thread: Re: For 2014?
  • Next by thread: Re: For 2014?