MathGroup Archive 2014

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Compact formulation of array of constraints

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg132187] Re: Compact formulation of array of constraints
  • From: Bob Hanlon <hanlonr357 at gmail.com>
  • Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 02:32:43 -0500 (EST)
  • Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
  • Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@wolfram.com
  • Delivered-to: mathgroup-outx@smc.vnet.net
  • Delivered-to: mathgroup-newsendx@smc.vnet.net
  • References: <20140111073531.79E3569E2@smc.vnet.net>

x[#] >= 0 & /@ Range[5]


{x[1] >= 0, x[2] >= 0,
   x[3] >= 0, x[4] >= 0,
   x[5] >= 0}


Thread[x /@ Range[5] >= 0]


{x[1] >= 0, x[2] >= 0,
   x[3] >= 0, x[4] >= 0,
   x[5] >= 0}



Bob Hanlon




On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 2:35 AM, Paul Smith <phhs80 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear All,
>
> How can one formulate the set of constraints
>
> x[1] >= 0, x[1] >= 0, x[2] >= 0, x[3] >= 0, x[4] >= 0, x[5] >= 0
>
> by using a compact form?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Paul
>
>




  • Prev by Date: Re: Number Interpretation
  • Next by Date: Re: Elasticity functions for Bezier and rectangular
  • Previous by thread: Re: Compact formulation of array of constraints
  • Next by thread: Re: Compact formulation of array of constraints