MathGroup Archive 2014

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Do we need a When function?

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg132411] Re: Do we need a When function?
  • From: Bob Hanlon <hanlonr357 at gmail.com>
  • Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 04:40:13 -0400 (EDT)
  • Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
  • Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@wolfram.com
  • Delivered-to: mathgroup-outx@smc.vnet.net
  • Delivered-to: mathgroup-newsendx@smc.vnet.net
  • References: <20140308074231.0A4506A0B@smc.vnet.net>

You can use PatternTest ( p?test ) or Condition ( patt /; test )


Clear[f1, f2, f3, f4]


f1[x_?NumericQ] = "success";


f1 /@ {x, 1, Pi, Infinity}


{f1[x], "success", "success", f1[=E2=88=9E]}


f2[x_?(NumericQ[#] &)] = "success";


f2 /@ {x, 1, Pi, Infinity}


{f2[x], "success", "success", f2[=E2=88=9E]}


f3[x_ /; NumericQ[x]] = "success";


f3 /@ {x, 1, Pi, Infinity}


{f3[x], "success", "success", f3[=E2=88=9E]}


f4[x_] := "success" /; NumericQ[x];


f4 /@ {x, 1, Pi, Infinity}


{f4[x], "success", "success", f4[=E2=88=9E]}


The tests or conditions can be any expression that evaluates to True or
False.



Bob Hanlon




On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 2:42 AM, David Bailey <dave at removedbailey.co.uk>wrote:

> Dear All,
>
> Recently I wanted to create an expression that only evaluated when x was
> a number. Obviously, one way to do that is to write something like:
>
>   If[x<1000000000000,f[x]]
>
> This will stay unevaluated until x is assigned to a number - as required
> - but it is very ugly because it makes it hard to understand what is
> going on.
>
> More generally, it would be nice to write an expression that will only
> evaluate when an expression is true. I solved that by writing a function
> When:
>
> SetAttributes[When, HoldAll];
> When[cond_, val_] := val /; cond
>
> However, my point is that this construction is sufficiently useful that
> it should be built in to Mathematica, and my solution might not be
> obvious to all users.
>
> Am I missing a simpler solution?
>
> Do others agree that this is an omission in the language?
>
> David Bailey
> http://www.dbaileyconsultancy.co.uk
>


  • Prev by Date: Re: FindFit and LeastSquares
  • Next by Date: Re: matrix manipulation
  • Previous by thread: Re: Do we need a When function?
  • Next by thread: Re: Do we need a When function?