Mathematica 9 is now available
Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
1990
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 1990

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Transformation Rules via Algebraic Rules

  • To: mathgroup-adm at yoda.ncsa.uiuc.edu
  • Subject: Re: Transformation Rules via Algebraic Rules
  • From: uunet!ub.cc.umich.edu!Jim_Wendel
  • Date: Mon, 23 Apr 90 14:05:54 EDT

This is in reply to "Transformation Rules via Algebraic Rules" posted 4/13
by ???.  It doesn't completely solve the problem, however.
Type rule1, you'll see x->t^(3/2).  Type rule2, you'll see {x->t^(3/2)},
apparently just rule1 surrounded by braces.  Define rule3={x->t^(3/2)}.
Type rule3, see apparently same as rule2 gave.  But if you request
InputForm of these rules you will see that they are very different; 1 & 3
are just the actual inputs, but rule2 is a complicated thing that makes
reference to an undocumented function AlgebraicRulesData, known to users
only as Protected.

Jim_Wendel at ub.cc.umich.edu.



  • Prev by Date: Re: supressing argument evaluation by function Part
  • Next by Date: deferred evaluation question
  • Previous by thread: Re: supressing argument evaluation by function Part
  • Next by thread: deferred evaluation question