MathGroup Archive 1990

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Consolidating the messages


[In your message entitled "Consolidating the messages", on May 31, you write:]
>
>    Dealing with 5 or 10 messages a day (each with its own
>header, etc.) has become a nuisance.  I would prefer the system
>exemplified by TeXhax Digest, where the moderator collects the
>messages and sends them out as one large file every 3 days (say),
>or when the accumulation has reached (say) 20 kilobytes,
>whichever happens first.
>
>    This would slow down responses, but copies of replies to
>specific queries should be sent directly to the original enquirer
>in any event.
>
>    There may be people with email who don't have access to
>sci.math.*, so that option would cut them out.
>
>                                   Steve Fulling
>

Personally, I don't like to read those Digest type things. It forces me to
(at least) scan over all the messages before I could reach the message I
want to read. I'm much happier to deal with individual messages. Of course,
creating a new news group is a much better idea. But as always, it's only my
own opinion. 

-- 
                            Guangliang He

                            ghe at PHYSICS.ORST.EDU
                            hegl at ORSTVM.BITNET



  • Prev by Date: Apply&Map
  • Next by Date: newsgroup vs. digest vs. status quo
  • Previous by thread: Apply&Map
  • Next by thread: newsgroup vs. digest vs. status quo