|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
[no subject]
- To: mathgroup at yoda.physics.unc.edu
- From: yoda at ele.crl.melco.co.jp
- Date: Wed, 27 May 92 15:22:05 JST
>>
>>It seems to me that Mma needs to have a compiler available to
>>use on finished code for production runs, and to provide compiled
>>rather than interpreted plugin units. Is such a thing in the works?
>>Without that Mma is only useful for preliminary exploration in
>>many problems. It seems unreasonable to have to recode in C or LISP
>>to get the speed needed to explore a problem, and it requires
>>reinventing all of the algorithms already available in Mma.
>>
I like your requests, Mathematica real compliler.... ummm, ummm,
that sounds good, that sounds good.
Even BASIC has its compiler!
Why not mma.
Kiyoshi Yoda
Mitsubishi Electric
Prev by Date:
Re: Hardware Mma ?
Next by Date:
Draft tutorial on TeX/Mathematica
Previous by thread:
Re: Expand[] on the RHS of a rule
Next by thread:
Draft tutorial on TeX/Mathematica
|