|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: UnitStep Argument
- To: mathgroup at christensen.cybernetics.net
- Subject: [mg658] Re: [mg628] UnitStep Argument
- From: Anthony Rebello <arebello at knox.edu>
- Date: Fri, 7 Apr 1995 16:26:22 -0500 (CDT)
If I understand your question you want template like
UnitStep[x_?NonNegative] := rhs
and onother template for unwanted values
Unitstep[x_?Negative] := 0.
However your method should work with minor syntactical adjustments
UnitStep[x_] := rhs/; NonNegative[x]
UnitStep[x] := 0/;Negative[x]
On Sat, 1 Apr 1995, Roger M. Jones wrote:
> How can I define
> UnitStep[-x], so that the answer is zero
> (.i.e. assign x as being a positive number).
> Defining:
>
> x/:Positive[x]=True doesn't work.
>
>
> Many thanks.
>
> ---
> Regards,
>
> Roger
> (rmj at llewelyn.slac.stanford.edu)
>
>
Prev by Date:
Re: Re: Polar Plots ...
Next by Date:
Optimal dividing of material
Previous by thread:
Re: UnitStep Argument
Next by thread:
Re: UnitStep Argument
|