RE: Bug ListPlot?

*Subject*: [mg2765] RE: [mg2755] Bug ListPlot?*From*: jfultz ("John R. Fultz")*Date*: Thu, 14 Dec 1995 01:47:12 -0500*Approved*: usenet@wri.com*Distribution*: local*Newsgroups*: wri.mathgroup*Organization*: Wolfram Research, Inc.

The option PlotJoined->True, by design, does not put the points on the graph. You can combine a line graph and a point graph by doing the following: g1=LogLogListPlot[data,GridLines -> Automatic, PlotStyle -> {PointSize[0.04]}] g2=LogLogListPlot[data,GridLines -> Automatic, PlotStyle -> {PointSize[0.04]}, PlotJoined -> True] Show[g1,g2] John Fultz Wolfram Research, Inc. ---------- From: Will Self[SMTP:wself at viking.emcmt.edu] To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net Subject: [mg2755] Bug ListPlot? A student of mine wanted to get plots of some data points. He wanted to show the points large and connect them with lines. . Here is what he did: data={{1,1},{2,3},{3,2}} LogLogListPlot[data,GridLines -> Automatic, PlotStyle -> {PointSize[0.04]}] LogLogListPlot[data,GridLines -> Automatic, PlotStyle -> {PointSize[0.04]}, PlotJoined -> True] In the first plot, he got large points but in the second plot the large points were absent. He is doing this on a PC. I tried this also on a Macintosh and got the same behavior. Would someone try it on somethihng else and see what happens? Would you call this a bug in ListPlot? Will Self