[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Help with NDSolve
*To*: mathgroup at christensen.cybernetics.net
*Subject*: [mg1541] Re: Help with NDSolve
*From*: rknapp (Robert Knapp)
*Date*: Sat, 24 Jun 1995 02:37:25 -0400
*Organization*: The Santa Fe Institute
In article <3s86l4$och at news0.cybernetics.net> imm at cs.umd.edu (Ibrahim Matta) writes:
> I am trying to solve a differential equation
> NN'[t] = lambda ( 1 - B[t] ) - mu NN[t]
> where B[t] is a fixed point of a function of NN[t] and B[t].
>
> The program below does not, however, terminate.
> It works if we use Nest instead of FixedPoint, but
> we need FixedPoint for the stopping criteria.
> I suspect that with FixedPoint Mathematica can not
> symbolically get the differential equations.
> Is there a way around this or it can't be done with
> Mathematica ?
>
> Any help is very much appreciated.
>
> Best regards,
> Ibrahim
>
> =============================================
>
> T = 20
> lambda = 0.8
> mu = 1.0
> K = 2
>
> Clear[NN]
> Clear[B]
>
>
> B[b_] := (NN[t] / (1 - b))^K / K! /
> (1 + Sum[(NN[t] / (1 - b))^ii / ii!, {ii, K}])
>
>
>
>
> sol = NDSolve[{NN'[t] ==
> lambda (1 - FixedPoint[B, 0.1, SameTest->(Abs[#1 - #2] < 10.^-4 &)])
> - mu NN[t], NN[0] == 0},
> NN, {t, T}]
>
> Plot[Evaluate[NN[t] /. sol], {t, 0, T}]
>
> =============================================
Your problem here is that NDSolve evaluates the equation before solving the equations. You will find that if you simply evaluate
{NN'[t] ==
lambda (1 - FixedPoint[B, 0.1, SameTest->(Abs[#1 - #2] < 10.^-4 &)])
- mu NN[t], NN[0] == 0}
by itself, the FixedPoint does not terminate because the condition is
never met with a symbolic N[t].
The solution (generally a good one in any case like this where
non-numeric evaluation is dangerous) is to prevent symbolic
evaluation. Here is a fix:
define a new function:
FixPointB[val_?NumberQ] :=
FixedPoint[B[val], 0.1, SameTest->(Abs[#1 - #2] < 10.^-4 &)]
this tests the argument "val" to be sure that it is a number before
attempting FixedPoint. Using this function and your other
definitions, the call to NDSolve:
In[17]:=
sol = NDSolve[{NN'[t] ==
lambda (1 - FixPointB[NN[t]])
- mu NN[t], NN[0] == 0},
NN, {t, T}]
Out[17]=
{{NN -> InterpolatingFunction[{0., 20.}, <>]}}
works as it should.
Rob Knapp
WRI
Prev by Date:
**Implicit surface plotting**
Next by Date:
**Re: counting number of rules in rule base**
Previous by thread:
**Re: counting number of rules in rule base**
Next by thread:
**Help with NDSolve**
| |