Re: Mma on PowerMac 8100 vs. Mma on PowerMac 9500

*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net*Subject*: [mg4348] Re: Mma on PowerMac 8100 vs. Mma on PowerMac 9500*From*: mrjohns2 at uiuc.edu (Matthew Johnson)*Date*: Thu, 11 Jul 1996 01:00:33 -0400*Organization*: Student of Chemical Engineering at UIUC*Sender*: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Are the macs set up the same? memory, system, cache, inits, ram, etc, monitor bit depth? matt In article <4qqn7v$49m at dragonfly.wolfram.com>, Elias Saab <mathes at esaab.math.missouri.edu> wrote: >I executed the following cell on a PowerMac 8100/100 > and a PowerMac 9500/132 > >It took 2.1 seconds on the 9500 and .46 second on the 8100. >It is strange. Any idea why? >Elias Saab > >In[178]:= >Clear[x,y,surface,f] >f[x_,y_]= x y; >surface=ParametricPlot3D[ >{{x,y,0}, {x,y,f[x,y]}},{x,0,2},{y,0,1}, >ViewPoint->{2.5 ,1.7, 1.4}, >BoxRatios->{2,1,2},AxesLabel->{"x","y","z"}]//Timing =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Matthew Johnson <mrjohns2 at uiuc.edu> <http://www.uiuc.edu/ph/www/mrjohns2/> ==== [MESSAGE SEPARATOR] ====