Mathematica 9 is now available
Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
1996
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 1996

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Questions re: Optica

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg5006] Questions re: Optica
  • From: Fisherman <halasz at sprynet.com>
  • Date: Sat, 19 Oct 1996 02:25:51 -0400
  • Organization: Sprynet News Service
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Anyone running Optica out there?

Do I have things screwed up; or is this the slowest optical package on
the market?

For a 100 ray trace function, the kernel keeps asking for more RAM (I've
got it up to 12MB), and after fifteen minutes or so, I lose my patience.

Oh, it's using one of the package demos, a cylindrical light source
reflecting into a parabolic mirror.

While I'm on my rant, who or what writes the booklets? For function
calls, say CircleOfRays[], they list the parameters in brackets as
'options', even in the glossary of terms. Couldn't they list what those
options _are_, or should I put in something like
CircleOfRays[air_conditioning, corinthian_leather]?

Any help is much appreciated (can't get to a phone for the next two days
during business hours).

TIA;

Fisherman.


  • Prev by Date: Re: ts ts ts
  • Next by Date: Comparison of Mathematica on Various Computers
  • Previous by thread: Re: AxesLabel and Frame on mathematica 2.2.3 (win)
  • Next by thread: re: Questions re: Optica