|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Questions re: Optica
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg5006] Questions re: Optica
- From: Fisherman <halasz at sprynet.com>
- Date: Sat, 19 Oct 1996 02:25:51 -0400
- Organization: Sprynet News Service
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Anyone running Optica out there?
Do I have things screwed up; or is this the slowest optical package on
the market?
For a 100 ray trace function, the kernel keeps asking for more RAM (I've
got it up to 12MB), and after fifteen minutes or so, I lose my patience.
Oh, it's using one of the package demos, a cylindrical light source
reflecting into a parabolic mirror.
While I'm on my rant, who or what writes the booklets? For function
calls, say CircleOfRays[], they list the parameters in brackets as
'options', even in the glossary of terms. Couldn't they list what those
options _are_, or should I put in something like
CircleOfRays[air_conditioning, corinthian_leather]?
Any help is much appreciated (can't get to a phone for the next two days
during business hours).
TIA;
Fisherman.
Prev by Date:
Re: ts ts ts
Next by Date:
Comparison of Mathematica on Various Computers
Previous by thread:
Re: AxesLabel and Frame on mathematica 2.2.3 (win)
Next by thread:
re: Questions re: Optica
|