MathGroup Archive 1997

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Useful Dumb User Questions


  > I recall reading that Microsoft has a policy of taking computer novices
  > off the street, sitting them down in front of Windows, and asking them
  > to perform certain tasks on the computer.  Microsoft monitors carefully
  > all the mistakes made by these novice users, in order to find out how
  > Windows could be made more intuitive.  That is the kind of analysis I am
  > calling for here.
  > 
  > Maybe such analysis is only appropriate for WRI personnel


I sure hope not. I hardly think the unbelievably clunky Windows
interface (and 10 years late) is a suitable metaphor.


  > Among other things, Mathematica is still a
  > command-line-driven program in an age of graphical user interfaces. 
  > Palettes and the like are a helpful step.

That's a little unfair. The Plot[] interface could 
certainly do with a neat interactive front-end, but
the underlying functions are both too numerous and too
integrated into what is ultimately a programming language
to be treated as graphical or menu objects. Even so, almost
all the mma functions are now available through the palettes.

Cheerio

Colin

-- 
Colin Rose 
tr(I) - Theoretical Research Institute
______________________________________
NOSPAMcrose at c2.telstra-mm.net.au
http://www.usyd.edu.au/su/tri/



  • Prev by Date: anti-aliasing MMA graphics
  • Next by Date: RE: TraceInternal and
  • Previous by thread: Re: Useful Dumb User Questions
  • Next by thread: Re: Useful Dumb User Questions