|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Useful Dumb User Questions
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg9051] Re: Useful Dumb User Questions
- From: crose at c2.telstra-mm.net.au (Colin Rose)
- Date: Thu, 9 Oct 1997 01:42:30 -0400
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
> I recall reading that Microsoft has a policy of taking computer novices
> off the street, sitting them down in front of Windows, and asking them
> to perform certain tasks on the computer. Microsoft monitors carefully
> all the mistakes made by these novice users, in order to find out how
> Windows could be made more intuitive. That is the kind of analysis I am
> calling for here.
>
> Maybe such analysis is only appropriate for WRI personnel
I sure hope not. I hardly think the unbelievably clunky Windows
interface (and 10 years late) is a suitable metaphor.
> Among other things, Mathematica is still a
> command-line-driven program in an age of graphical user interfaces.
> Palettes and the like are a helpful step.
That's a little unfair. The Plot[] interface could
certainly do with a neat interactive front-end, but
the underlying functions are both too numerous and too
integrated into what is ultimately a programming language
to be treated as graphical or menu objects. Even so, almost
all the mma functions are now available through the palettes.
Cheerio
Colin
--
Colin Rose
tr(I) - Theoretical Research Institute
______________________________________
NOSPAMcrose at c2.telstra-mm.net.au
http://www.usyd.edu.au/su/tri/
Prev by Date:
anti-aliasing MMA graphics
Next by Date:
RE: TraceInternal and
Previous by thread:
Re: Useful Dumb User Questions
Next by thread:
Re: Useful Dumb User Questions
|