Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
1997
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 1997

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Re: Not so Useful Dumb User Questions

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg9214] Re: [mg9176] Re: [mg9148] Not so Useful Dumb User Questions
  • From: Axel Schwalm <a3023575 at smail3.rrz.Uni-Koeln.DE>
  • Date: Fri, 24 Oct 1997 01:00:29 -0400
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Mark Evans wrote:
>I understand the theoretical justification for complex numbers in...
Dear Mark,
I agree with every word You wrote. Don't forget that any software around 
for symbolic computation is in a state of, say, debugging. People are 
working hard on it, to make them work properly. (And think about, which 
sphere they must come from, to do this work right.) From the the day, 
Mathematica (or any mathprogram) works as reliable as mathematics, only 
ease of use will rule selling rates. And then they will read Your 
suggestion once again. So don't worry.

Axel


  • Prev by Date: Re: Re: Mathematica 3.0.0 bug in LerchPhi function
  • Next by Date: Bayesian techniques
  • Previous by thread: Re: Not so Useful Dumb User Questions
  • Next by thread: RE: Re: Re: Not so Useful Dumb User Questions