|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Newbie question: big matrix calculations
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg9253] Newbie question: big matrix calculations
- From: dscott at ews.uiuc.edu (Dennis Wayne Scott)
- Date: Fri, 24 Oct 1997 01:01:06 -0400
- Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
This is the first time I've ever been in this newsgroup, so please try
to excuse anything I do/say that's silly to the experts...
I have three 100x100 sparse (diagonal) matrices (matrxD, matrxU, and
matrxL) and three 100x1 matrices (b, x2, and x1), and I'm performing
several operation on them:
x2 = -Inverse[matrxD].(matrxL+matrxU).x1+Inverse[matrxD].b;
I have to do it MANY, MANY times... with a 5x5 matrix it takes a few
minutes, but with a 100x100 it takes longer than eight hours (and still
running). Does anyone (offhandedly) know of a way to reduce the time
this takes for Mathematica to solve?
I'm using a P133 and Mathematica 2.2.
The entire hunk of code is viewable at:
http://www.cen.uiuc.edu/~dscott/PartB.gif solved for a 5x5 matrix
"size".
PS-I've already tried decreasing the "accrcy" and changing my initial
"guess"...
Thanks!
--
Dennis W. Scott, Jr.
University of Illinois at Urbana dscott at ews.uiuc.edu
----------------------------------------------------------------
Aspiring Electrical Engineer "I want to know God's
thoughts...
Prev by Date:
MORE: Statistics`ContinousDistributions` (integrating over a UniformDistribution)
Next by Date:
Re: Help - Mathematica bombs out on loading <<Calculus`LaplaceTransform`
Previous by thread:
Re: MORE: Statistics`ContinousDistributions` (integrating over a UniformDistribution)
Next by thread:
Re: Newbie question: big matrix calculations
|