|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: A generalized Transpose?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg9284] Re: A generalized Transpose?
- From: "Xah" <xah at best.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 02:46:55 -0500
- Organization: smtp.best.com
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
In article <62h589$cg2 at smc.vnet.net>, Robert Villegas <villegas at wolfram.com>
wrote:
>One of the best ways to apply a function to, or group, corresponding
>elements of lists is to use a Listable function. This will work when
>the "identical form" is an irregularly nested list ...
Hi Robby,
Can you give a spec for the behavior of Listable attribute? In other
words, how can I write a function
ListableBehavior[f_,args___]
such that the result returned is equivalent to executing f[args] where f
has the Listable attribute? (Of course, without using the build-in
Listable functionality.)
I dabbled with Thread, but don't have the exact solution.
Xah, xah at best.com
http://www.best.com/~xah/Wallpaper_dir/c0_WallPaper.html
Mountain View, CA, USA
"Java -- the modern backward language"
Prev by Date:
Re: integration problem???
Next by Date:
Re: integration problem???
Previous by thread:
Re: A generalized Transpose?
Next by thread:
RE:
|