RE: [Q] Factoring arrays

*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net*Subject*: [mg14981] RE: [mg14929] [Q] Factoring arrays*From*: "Ersek, Ted R" <ErsekTR at navair.navy.mil>*Date*: Wed, 2 Dec 1998 03:59:02 -0500*Sender*: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Kevin Jaffe wrote: > >I'm dealing with some large arrays of symbolic >expressions; it often happens that all the >elements of the array have an >obvious common factor. These >arrays would become much more >readable if the common factor were >pulled out in front as a prefactor >for the array, but I can't figure >out how to get Mathematica to do >this. As a (tiny) example: > >{{v[2]^2 v[3], -v[1] v[2] v[3]}, > {-v[1] v[2] v[3], v[1]^2 v[3]}} > >Is there a way to get Mathematica >to pull out the common v[3] factor >from the array above? > > As far as I am aware you have to have something in the output expression to prevent the common factor from being multiplied through before it's sent out for display. HoldForm will work, and you could write a program to find the common-factor and automate the whole thing. In the line below I manually pull out the common factor. In[1]:= matrx={{v[2]^2 v[3], -v[1] v[2] v[3]}, {-v[1] v[2] v[3], v[1]^2 v[3]}}/ v[3]; factrd=HoldForm[v[3] #]&[matrx] Out[1]= (* your matrix factored not shown *) The problem is that if you want to do anything with this expression you have to use ReleaseHold first. For example the line below will find the Det of the above matrix. In[2]:= Det[ReleaseHold[factrd]] ___________________ What we really need is a new type of hold that will work like HoldForm, but is automatically released as soon as you try to do anything (well almost anything) with the "held" expression. The idea is to give the illusion that the held expression was fully evaluated. I have asked several developers at Wolfram Research to provide such a feature. Although I am not sure if they have any plans to provide it. Other applications for this feature are shown below. _____________________ I might like to have a function give a result in increasing powers of a monomial. An example of such an output is: 3s(e-h)+2(e-h)^2+5k(e-h)^3 But Mathematica insist on arranging the above canonical order giving: 2(e-h)^2 + 5(e-h)^3*k + 3(e-h)*s _____________________ I would like to have an output expression including the form (w x y z)^2 displayed without distributing Power, but Mathematica insists that this should evaluate to (w^2x^2y^2z^2). ____________________ I would like to have output expressions including the form Sqrt[5 x] displayed without distributing Sqrt, but Mathematica insists that Sqrt[5 x] should evaluate to (Sqrt[5] Sqrt[x]). ____________________ I would like to have an expression containing 48(10^n) do nothing else with 48(10^n), but Mathematica insists that 48(10^n) should evaluate to (3*2^(4+n)*5^n). ____________________ I would like to have Simplify or FullSimplify notice that the expression (18446744073709551616-n)/5 can be expressed more concisely as ((2^64-n)/5), but Mathematica doesn't do this. Mathematica insists that 2^64 should evaluate to (18446744073709551616). ____________________ I would like to be able to get a power series where integers to a power and factorials are not evaluated. For example the following would be a power series expansion of BesselI[0,x]. 1+z^2/2^2+z^4/2^4/(2!)^2+z^8/2^8/(4!)^2+O[x]^6 ____________________ Programs can be written to do everything I mention here except the output expression must make use of HoldForm. Before the output expression is used later on one must use ReleaseHold. The user should be permitted to any output mentioned above without using ReleaseHold of a similar construct. Cheers, Ted Ersek

**Reading Native Excel files**

**Can Factorial[] be compiled?**

**Re: Reading Native Excel files**

**Can Factorial[] be compiled?**