# Solve, Plot and limits

*To*: mathgroup@smc.vnet.net*Subject*: [mg10810] Solve, Plot and limits*From*: andrzej <andrzej@tuins.ac.jp>*Date*: Thu, 5 Feb 1998 00:58:54 -0500

Subject: [mg10810] Solve, Plot and limits mathgroup@smc.vnet.net >Subject: [mg10810] Re: >Sent: 1/30/98 3:31 PM >Received: 2/1/98 9:09 AM >From: seanross@worldnet.att.net To: mathgroup@smc.vnet.net >To: mathematica users group, mathgroup@smc.vnet.net > Andrzej Kozlowski, andrzej@tuins.ac.jp > >Andrzej Kozlowski wrote: >> >> In article <6ahorb$pkh@smc.vnet.net>, seanross@worldnet.att.net wrote: >> >> > alok. menghrajani wrote: >> > > >> > > Hi, >> > > >> > > I'm 16 and I can't understand how I (why me?) found this bug in >> > > mathematica. It's such a silly thing: >> > > >> > > Solve [x/x+x=1, x] returns x=0 but if x=0 then x/x has no sence! >> > > >> > > Bye, ALok >> > > >> > > (Pls reply to my email: robot@writeme.com) >> > >> > >> > Its not a bug. You are missing a pre-calculus course in limits. Perhaps >> > your high school offers one. >> >> It may sound very pedantic but I must say I feel this reply is a little >> unfair to Alok. The equation x/x+x== 1 is an algebraic equation and >> the solution {x->0} is certainly incorrect. I would fail any of my >> students who claimed it was. > >On what basis do you argue that x/x+x==1 being solved by x->0 is >"certainly" incorrect? Your comment about modular equations is >irrelevant since we aren't dealing with modular arithmetic. >Try, for example: > >Plot[x/x+x-1,{x,.001,10}] > >To see where the limit points to. I also disagree with calling this >certain equation "algebraic", which indicates that it is soluble by >methods of algebra as opposed to a trancendental equation which is not. >x/x+x==1 is soluble by algebra except at the point x->0 in which case, >limits are necessary. > >Since you would "fail" me for saying x->0 was a solution to the >equation, what would you tell me the correct answer was? I can't find >any other real solutions besides zero. > >-- >Remove the _nospam_ in the return address to respond. 1. Cancelling x's in x/x has nothing to do with "taking limits". If Mathematica is "taking limits" why does Solve[Sin[x]/x+x==1,x] not work? 2. To find the correct solution try Solve[{x/u+x==1,x==u},{x,u}] The answer is {}, in other words there is no solution. Try it yourself.(This time Mathematica uses Groenber basis to solve the equations and so it never needs to cancel x/x) Now, if the other answwer is correct than this presumabl is a bug? Or do you claim that these equations are not equivalent? Finally, the documentation for Solve mentions nothing at all about any limits. On the contrary, all the techniques involved work for equations over fields of charactersitic 0, and that is also why they can be modified to solve modular equations.This fact excludes any possibility of using limits. On the other hand, Plots of course work only for real numbers, and then it does make sense to talk of limits. That is why Plot[Sin[x]/x+x-1,{x,-Pi,Pi}] does work while Solve[Sin[x]/x+x==1,x] does not. Andrzej Kozlowski Department of Mathematics Toyama International University Japan

**Knowledge about a Mathematica book**

**Re: annoying Mathematica 3.0 behavior**

**Re: Knowledge about a Mathematica book**

**Re: Solve, Plot and limits**