MathGroup Archive 1998

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Calculus`FourierTransform`


  • To: mathgroup@smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg11737] Re: Calculus`FourierTransform`
  • From: John Biddiscombe <j.biddiscombe.yum.SPAM.yum@rl.ac.uk>
  • Date: Thu, 26 Mar 1998 03:09:04 -0500
  • Organization: Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
  • References: <6emdjm$nno@smc.vnet.net> <6esone$68d@smc.vnet.net>

John Biddiscombe wrote:

> Does anyone know of another or a better Fourier Analysis package
> publicly available ?

I spent some time looking through the mathsource archives on the Wolfram
site, and tracked down a signal processing package. It looks pretty
good and handles many of the standard constructs much more sensibly
than the default Fourier libraries.

one tip

if you do this

Raised cosine....gated by a rectangular pulse rc = (1/2)*(1 + Cos[(2 Pi
t)/pulselen]) x=CPulse[pulselen,t+pulselen/2]*Cos[ 2 Pi carrier t]

and then 
fx=CTFTransform[x,t,w]

you may wait for years for an answer....

but if you do this

x=Simplify[CPulse[pulselen,t+pulselen/2]*Cos[ 2 Pi carrier t]] IE add
SIMPLIFY to make it into break-uppable chunks for the rules to get to
work on...you get an answer in seconds.

John B

-- 
Spam tastes Yummy, but I've had too much lately, please note doctored
reply to address.



  • Prev by Date: Free Beta Version of QNAT (using Mathematica)
  • Next by Date: Re: Data Extraction from List {{x1,y1}..{xn,yn}}where ##<x<##
  • Prev by thread: Re: Calculus`FourierTransform`
  • Next by thread: odd behavior of NDSolve