[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Can I get ComplexExpand to really work?
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg14582] Re: Can I get ComplexExpand to really work?
*From*: Alan Lewis <alanlewis at home.com>
*Date*: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 03:07:49 -0500
*Organization*: @Home Network
*References*: <719f5p$lc6@smc.vnet.net>
*Sender*: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Hi,
If you set the option GenerateConditions->False inside the integral,
you will not get the conditional output.
Alan
Topher Cawlfield wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm having lots of problems getting Mathematica to make simplifying
> assumptions. It always seems to want to produce horribly complex
> results because it assumes every variable is complex. I wish I had
> better control of that. In fact, it would also be nice if I could
> assure Mathematica that certain variables were positive as well.
>
> It sounds like the function ComplexExpand should do the trick, at least
> by assuming that variables are real unless otherwise specified. But it
> doesn't really seem to work for me. Here's an example:
>
> ComplexExpand[Integrate[E^(I a x^2), {x, -Infinity, Infinity}]]
>
> produces:
>
> If[Im[a] == 0, Sqrt[Pi/2] (1 + I Sign[a]) / (a^2)^(1/4), Integrate[E^(I
> a x^2), {x, -Infinity, Infinity}]]
>
> But if it really was assuming that 'a' was real, then it should know
> that Im[a] == 0! If I could also tell it that 'a' was positive, the
> answer would be:
>
> (1 + I) Sqrt[Pi/a] or better still, Sqrt[2 Pi I / a]
>
> This is much simpler, and is the answer I want.
>
> Of course, my real application of this problem is much more complicated,
> but ultimately comes down to doing that integral (several times over).
> The right answer should be just about that simple, but instead
> Mathematica gives me about 5 pages of output.
>
> Is there any hope of getting reasonable symbolic results here?
>
> - Topher Cawlfield
Prev by Date:
**beep after calculation for Ver 3**
Next by Date:
**Re: Thread and Set**
Previous by thread:
**Re: Can I get ComplexExpand to really work?**
Next by thread:
**Re: Can I get ComplexExpand to really work?**
| |