Re: Mathematica as an Object
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg15708] Re: Mathematica as an Object
- From: Jens-Peer Kuska <kuska at informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
- Date: Fri, 5 Feb 1999 03:42:09 -0500 (EST)
- Organization: Universitaet Leipzig
- References: <email@example.com>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
I don't know how You repeatly call Mathematica. Via MathLink it is no
problem to run the Mathematica kernel. Your program must act like a
(very special) frontend. I have no idea how Gauss interact with
programs but Your problem is not a Mathematica problem you must tell
Gauss to to launch the Mathematica kernel and to communicate with it.
But why using Gauss at all ? mathematica is more poverfull than Gauss
and if you need extra speed you can write a MathLink child that do all
the time consuming numerical tasks for you.
David Revelt wrote:
> I have a function that I need to integrate over and over again. The
> quickest way to do it is to integrate the function symbolically, and
> then plug in numbers for the parameters to evaluate it. The solution
> to the symbolic integral is complicated consisting of a polynomial of
> over 100 terms.
> Thanks for your help.
Prev by Date:
Displaying the intermediate steps of an evaluation
Next by Date:
RE: RE: Help to clarify 'Map', 'Apply', and ' Thread'.
Previous by thread:
Mathematica as an Object
Next by thread:
Re: D vs. Derivative (2)