Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
1999
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 1999

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Re: Re: Bug?

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg15960] Re: [mg15899] Re: [mg15854] Re: Bug?
  • From: Dennis Swaney <dennis at system.ecology.su.se>
  • Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 03:26:51 -0500
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

BobHanlon at aol.com wrote:
>
>In a message dated 2/12/99 8:49:55 PM, ck at kagi.com writes:
>
>>> This does not occur in any Mathematica I have.  Try it again.
>>> The error message looks like you may have mistyped.
>>> 
>>> Moderator
>>> 
>>> > I have found something strange in Mathematica:
>>> > 
>>> > Integrate[Exp[x]/Log[x],x]
>>> > 
>>> > which yields the following error message:
>>> > 
>>> > Log::"argt": 
>>> >     "\!\(Log\) called with \!\(0\) arguments; \!\(1\) or \!\(2\)
>>> > arguments \
>>> > are expected."
>>> > 
>>> > This is on Mathematica 3.0.1.1x Macintosh (Student).
>>> > 
>>> > -- 
>>> > Christoffer Karlsson
>>> > Macintosh Software Developer
>>> > 
>>
>>Still happens. I tried to write it in 3 different forms, but still gives
>>me the same error (other variations such as Log[x]/Exp[x] works just
>>fine). I know it is bizarre but I am certain I have typed it correctly
>>but there might be something wrong with my setup (not that I have
>>really fiddled with it).
>>
>....

I also get the error under windows on a pentium machine:

{$System, $Version}

{"Microsoft Windows","Microsoft Windows 3.0 (April 25, 1997)"}

Integrate[Exp[x]/Log[x],x]

Log::"argt": "\!\(Log\) called with \!\(0\) arguments; \!\(1\) or \!\(2\)
arguments \
are expected."
Out[17] = \!\(\[Integral]\(E\^x\/Log[x]\) \[DifferentialD]x\)




  • Prev by Date: Re: Losing Mathematica password
  • Next by Date: Simple recursive assignment
  • Previous by thread: Re: Re: Bug?
  • Next by thread: Re: Re: Bug?