ExpIntegralEi

*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net*Subject*: [mg18463] ExpIntegralEi*From*: Lionel ARNAUD <arnaud at lmt.ens-cachan.fr>*Date*: Wed, 7 Jul 1999 00:11:42 -0400*Organization*: ENS Cachan, France*Sender*: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Hello, I am from LMT-Cachan FRANCE, working with MATHEMATICA V.3, I made this calculation: c2 = -0.05018627683354541 - 0.153047656745338 I; c3 = -0.7828709924214918 + 0.2780791279205129 I; c5 = -0.6758555487562639 - 0.04753624179417532 I; Integrate[Exp[beta*c2+s*(c3+beta*c5)], {s,0,1},{beta,0,1}] NIntegrate[Exp[beta*c2+s*(c3+beta*c5)], {s,0,1},{beta,0,1}] The results given are: -0.228103 + 10.5644 I 0.587252 + 0.0191685 I Not the same ! Options of accuracy, algorithm,... don't change much the result, even if you change c2, c3 or c5 a little. In fact the Exp[beta...] is very regular and you can plot it and observe that the good result is given by the Nintegral. It seems that the formal integration given by Mathematica is not totally correct. If you can tell me more, I am interested..