MathGroup Archive 1999

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Simplifying constants

  • To: mathgroup at
  • Subject: [mg18515] Re: Simplifying constants
  • From: Jens-Peer Kuska <kuska at>
  • Date: Thu, 8 Jul 1999 22:32:52 -0400
  • Organization: Universitaet Leipzig
  • References: <7m14k0$>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at


since Set[b+c+d+e,A] is nonsense I assume you mean Equal[b+c+d+e,A].
It is a matter of taste *what* you regard as simpler equations.

I use typical pattern matching to turn
a==b to a-b==0

or to exchange 
a==b to b==a.

How ever the best and unique form is to force that all your equations
are look lilke
expr == 0

"Morten G. Dyndgaard" wrote:
> Hi,
> I am working with some annoyingly long equations that I want to simplify
> by including one set of parameters in a constant (or function) A, and
> another in B and so on.
> You can easily do:
> A = b+c+d+e
> but what I want to do is the reverse:
> b+c+d+e = A
> and use this information to reduce the equations. Does anybody know how
> to do this?
> --
> Morten G. Dyndgaard
> E-mail: mgd at

  • Prev by Date: Charles Muses work on hypernumbers, metadimensions, and Chronotopology.
  • Next by Date: Re: trouble with printing
  • Previous by thread: RE: Simplifying constants
  • Next by thread: RE: Simplifying constants