|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: "At long last, Sir, have you no shame?"
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg18541] Re: "At long last, Sir, have you no shame?"
- From: sidles at u.washington.edu (John A. Sidles)
- Date: Sat, 10 Jul 1999 02:18:42 -0400
- Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
- References: <7luk6s$l95@smc.vnet.net> <7m3l4p$si1@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
>David Withoff <withoff at wolfram.com> wrote:
>>independent experts often disagree about what is or is not a bug.
Savvy Mathematica users learn not to use the word "bug" when
talking to Wolfram Technical Support! I suggest the phrase
"unexpected behavior" instead. This avoids pointless
discussions of what the documentation does or does not
guarantee.
As a concrete suggestion, how about a Wolfram web page
listing, for *every* built-in Mathematica command, the
"unexpected behaviors" that users have reported, together
with workarounds. Special priority should be given to
Gotchas that occur silently or sporadically --- these
are by far the biggest threats to software integrity.
In fact, it would make sense to restrict the list to
*only* silently-failing "Gotchas".
How many Mathematica users would consult such a page? I
sure would.
A "Gotcha" Page solves many problems for Wolfram management
--- for example, it would not obligate Wolfram to release
software patches, or even to acknowledge gotchas as bugs,
because almost all gotchas are easy to work around, *if* you
know about them! And it would be easy to organize --- just
list the commands in alphabetical order, and then for each
command, sort the reported gotchas in descending order of
frequency reported. And it wouldn't be excessively long --
most Mathematica commands have no more than one or two
silently-failing "Gotchas".
And finally, need I say that users and low-level tech support
personnel should be the ones to determine what goes on the
Gotcha page, *not* Wolfram management? The job of managment
should be to read and learn from the Gotcha Page, not censor it!
Prev by Date:
Re: Try this on your shiny new v4 Front end (Mac)
Next by Date:
Re: "Solve" or "FindRoot" in a module
Previous by thread:
Re: "At long last, Sir, have you no shame?"
Next by thread:
RE: Re: "At long last, Sir, have you no shame?"
|