Re: Re: Simplifying constants...bug?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg18582] Re: [mg18559] Re: [mg18489] Simplifying constants...bug?
- From: "Kevin J. McCann" <kevinmccann at Home.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 01:01:22 -0400
- References: <7m3l22$shp@smc.vnet.net> <199907100618.CAA03008@smc.vnet.net.>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
I tried it on 4.0 (Wintel) and it worked as expected, i.e. (a - z)/(b - z). even this works: (a + c*d)/(b + c*d) /. c*d -> -z i.e. "/." instead of //. Kevin ----- Original Message ----- From: <calvitti at boes.ces.cwru.edu> To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net Subject: [mg18582] [mg18559] Re: [mg18489] Simplifying constants...bug? > > here's some intersting behavior in 3.0: > > (a + c*d)/(b + c*d) //. c*d -> -z > > gives (as expected): > > (a - z)/(b - z) > > yet > > (a + c*d)/(c*d) //. c*d -> -z > > no longer simplifes the denominator: > > (a+b-z)/(c*d) > > anyone know why? > > +------------------------------------------+ > alan c > systems and control engineering > case western reserve university > > calvitti at alpha.ces.cwru.edu > +------------------------------------------+ > > > > "Ersek, Ted R" <ErsekTR at navair.navy.mil> writes: > > > Morten G. Dyndgaard wrote: > > ----------------------------- > > I am working with some annoyingly long equations that I want to simplify > > by including one set of parameters in a constant (or function) A, and > > another in B and so on. > > > > You can easily do: > > A = b+c+d+e > > > > but what I want to do is the reverse: > > b+c+d+e = A > > ----------------------------- > > > > This should help. > > In[1]:= > > expr=a+b+b1+c+c1+d+d1+e; > > > > > > In[2]:= > > expr/.a+b+c+d+e->A > > > > Out[2]= > > A+b1+c1+d1 > > > > > > Regards, > > Ted Ersek >
- References:
- Re: Simplifying constants...bug?
- From: calvitti@boes.ces.cwru.edu
- Re: Simplifying constants...bug?