why so long?

*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net*Subject*: [mg22983] why so long?*From*: Otto Linsuain <linsuain+ at andrew.cmu.edu>*Date*: Sat, 8 Apr 2000 14:44:49 -0400 (EDT)*Sender*: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Hi all. I am trying to solve a system of 2 coupled integral equations by iterations. I wonder why it takes so long to do the integrals. Here is an outline of what is happening. Want to find two functions A[x], B[x] that solve the equations. Define A[1][x], B[1][x] as my initial guess, these are just constant positive functions, they are of course not the final solutions, but they are not a bad starting point. Need to define some (4) combinations of A and B that go into the integrals, they look like: f[n][y,x]= A[n-1][y x] (B[n-1][y x] +/- B[n-1][x])/(y x A^2[n-1][y x] + B^2[n-1][y x]) and similar stuff. Notice the recursive step in n, also notice that the f's are not linear in A and B. These functions then get multiplied by some Hypergeometric2F1[a,b,c,y] or Hypergeometric2F1[a,b,c,1/y] (a,b,c are constants) and the new A,B are defined as: A,B[n_][x_]:=A,B[n][x]=Some Constants+(x^(1-a)) Some Constants NIntegrate[f[n][y,x] Hypergeometric2F1[a,b,c,y],{y,0,Infinity}], with different f's for A and B. Notice that I make Mathematica remember the values of A and B already calculated, namely to save time, at the expense of memory. There are no singularities in the integration, I know that there are singularities in the Hypergeometric2F1[a,b,c,y] for y between 1 and Infinity, but the integration is actually broken from 0 to 1 the Hypergeometric is in y and from 1 to Infinity it is in 1/y. The cases that could be singular around one and the integration out to Infinity are treated separatelly. The numerical integration is cut a little away from one and at a big number and those contributions to the integrals are estimated by a procedure that does not involve numerical crunching on the behalf of Mathematica. My philosophy here has been that Mathematica integrates the big chunk of well behaved functions (conputationally easy, mathematically hard) and I estimate analitically the rest. I then ask Mathematica to plot A,B[2],[3],[4] and so on in a finite region of x. I understand that Mathematica might need to go back and compute A and B [2] at more additional points in order to compute A and B [3], but it just takes too long. It takes about 1-15 min to do the first plots A and B [2], but then I have been waiting 48 hours for the next one, still waiting... No error messages, there used to be some but I have changed the procedures and debugged the code. I am working on a pretty new Linux station with 2 CPU's and two other jobs runnung in it. All three jobs are niced to 15 to allow live users to run other jobs. I understand this all takes CPU time but still. Any suggestions?, maybe my entire approach to the problem is not very efficient. Any help will be much appreciated. Otto Linsuain.

**Re: Re: Q: Axes on top of graphics primitives?**

**Re: RE:graphics export to LAtek and Word**

**Selecting cells**

**selfdefined operators**