[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: rules for Sign[_]^n
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg26353] Re: [mg26337] rules for Sign[_]^n
*From*: Andrzej Kozlowski <andrzej at bekkoame.ne.jp>
*Date*: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 02:41:15 -0500 (EST)
*Sender*: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
on 12/12/00 4:54 PM, Adalbert Hanssen at hanssen at Zeiss.de wrote:
> Hi, MathGroup,
>
> dealing with Sign, it would be useful, if Mathematica
> knew
>
> {(Sign[_])^(y_?EvenQ):>1, (Sign[x_])^(y_?OddQ):>Sign[x]}
>
> How can I teach Mathematica this rule (in Init.m), such that it
> automaticly applies it in Simplify, Expand and the like
> whenever applicable?
>
> kind regards
>
> Dipl.-Math. Adalbert Hanszen
>
In fact it is easy enough to do:
In[1]:=
Unprotect[Sign];
In[2]:=
Sign /: Sign[_]^x_?EvenQ = 1; Sign /: Sign[y_]^x_?OddQ = Sign[y];
In[3]:=
Protect[Sign];
Now:
In[4]:=
Sign[x^4*y^3]
Out[4]=
Sign[y]
and so on.
Note however that this contradicts the built-in meaning of Sign in
Mathematica in certain special cases. In Mathematica Sign[0] is 0 (and
Sign[I] is I). So you can now produce contradictions like:
In[5]:=
( Sign[x] - x)^2 /. x -> 0
Out[5]=
0
In[6]:=
Expand[( Sign[x] - x)^2] /. x -> 0
Out[6]=
1
Note also that even without these definitions Mathemtica will (almost)
correctly apply rules for Sign in Simplify:
(Fresh Kernel session)
In[1]:=
Simplify[Sign[x]^12, Element[x, Reals] && x ? 0]
Out[1]=
1
In[2]:=
Simplify[Sign[x]^13, Element[x, Reals] && x ? 0]
Out[2]=
13
Sign[x]
This last output seems a bit unfortunate and probably ought to be corrected
in a future version. Still:
In[3]:=
Simplify[Sign[x]^13, x > 0]
Out[3]=
1
In[4]:=
Simplify[Sign[x]^13, x < 0]
Out[4]=
-1
are fine.
--
Andrzej Kozlowski
Toyama International University
JAPAN
http://platon.c.u-tokyo.ac.jp/andrzej/
http://sigma.tuins.ac.jp/
Prev by Date:
**Re: Graphics3D[Plot3D[]] vs. ParametricPlot3D[]**
Next by Date:
**Bug in Limit Package**
Previous by thread:
**RE: rules for Sign[_]^n**
Next by thread:
**Color Charts**
| |