Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2000
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2000

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Improvements

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg21802] Re: Improvements
  • From: "Jordan Rosenthal" <jr at ece.gatech.edu>
  • Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 01:45:53 -0500 (EST)
  • Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta GA, USA
  • References: <86r6ru$b2t@smc.vnet.net>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Mark,

I assume this posting was directed at me since I posted the "Could this be
improved?" question.

Your observation that the matrix was a convolution matrix is astute.
Although what I am doing is related to convolution, I will not actually be
implementing a convolution with this.  I know that ListConvolve would be
better for that.  The matrix is part of a larger expression that I wanted to
visualize with Mathematica and since I figured it was simple enough, I could
use it to try and learn more about Mathematica programming.

Jordan


"DIAMOND Mark" <noname at noname.com> wrote in message
news:86r6ru$b2t at smc.vnet.net...
> This is somewhat tangential to the specific "how do I improve it" question
> that you asked, but as a matter of interest, is this the first step in
> producing a convolution ... because if so, there may be a *completely*
> different way.
>
>
> Mark R Diamond
> Vision Research Laboratory
> The University of Western Australia
> no spam email: markd at psy dot uwa dot edu dot au
>
>
>




  • Prev by Date: Re: How to Break[] out of nested loops?
  • Next by Date: Re: Could this be improved?---Continued
  • Previous by thread: Improvements
  • Next by thread: Re:& graphs and buttons