|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Using Block instead of Module?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg24400] Re: Using Block instead of Module?
- From: Mark Fisher <me.fisher at atl.frb.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 23:13:43 -0400 (EDT)
- Organization: Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
- References: <8jtf5f$ik5@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
I haven't sorted out exactly what is going in these two examples. Block
and Module are different: Module creates a new symbol, while Block uses
the given symbol. Nevertheless, there is an even shorter version of your
program that works:
In[25]:=
outputTest[lst_List, id_Integer] := Put[lst, ToString[id] <> ".txt"]
In[26]:=
outputTest[{1, 2, 3}, 3]
In[27]:=
!! 3.txt
{1, 2, 3}
--Mark.
Prev by Date:
step by step integration / FT
Next by Date:
Nice displaing vs. orrible printing
Previous by thread:
RE: Using Block instead of Module?
Next by thread:
Memory problems using mathlink (Sparse Matrix)
|