[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Simplification shortcomings?
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg24653] Re: [mg24621] Simplification shortcomings?
*From*: BobHanlon at aol.com
*Date*: Mon, 31 Jul 2000 09:23:23 -0400 (EDT)
*Sender*: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Use FullSimplify
In a message dated 7/28/2000 6:11:02 PM, nitlion at mindspring.com writes:
>I'm a relative novice to Mathematica. While working with it today, I had
>occasion to want to know if a result was equal to (1 + Sqrt[5])/2. The
>result was shown as Sqrt[(3 + Sqrt[5])/2]. After some pancil and paper
>work, I figured out that these two are equal. Or, I should say, that the
>former is one of the values that the latter can have.
>
>I was frustrated in my attempts to get Mathematica to answer that question
>for me. Simplify[(1 + Sqrt[5])/2 - Sqrt[(3 + Sqrt[5])/2]] didn't provide
>any improvement. Calculating this value to many decimal digits showed
>it
>was near zero (probably close enough that I could have applied the
>techniques shown in Scheinerman's recent article in American Mathematical
>Monthly). The only way I got Mathematica to show the equality was to square
>both numbers; Simplify[((1 + Sqrt[5])/2)^2 - (3 + Sqrt[5])/2] is zero.
>
>Is there any better way to do this? I have some other, more complicated
>numbers that I need to compare.
>
Prev by Date:
**Re: Re: More about l`Hopital`s rule**
Next by Date:
**Re: getting module output in replace form**
Previous by thread:
**Re: Simplification shortcomings?**
Next by thread:
**Re: Simplification shortcomings?**
| |