Re: And, Or, Intersection, Union - no Orderless attribute

*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net*Subject*: [mg24019] Re: [mg23994] And, Or, Intersection, Union - no Orderless attribute*From*: Andrzej Kozlowski <andrzej at tuins.ac.jp>*Date*: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 03:07:34 -0400 (EDT)*Sender*: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

First of all, one should not identify the Orderless attribute with commutativity. Rather, the Orderless attribute is one of the ways in which commutativity is implemented in Mathematica. There are however, other ways, and there are cases when having the Orderless attribute would be wasteful or have undesirable side-effects. The cases you mention belong to this category. When a function has the Orderless attribute its arguments are sorted before the function is applied. For various reasons this may be inconvenient, even when the function is "commutative". The cases you mention belong to two different groups, and the reasons are somwhat different. First, the logical functions, And and Or. Let's see what the mathematica book says about And: "e1 && e2 && ... is the logical AND function. It evaluates its arguments in order, giving False immediately if any of them are False, and True if they are all True." Note carefully "evaluates its arguments in order...". A brief reflection shows why this may be desirable. Suppose for example you want to check a condition which can be represented in the form p && q, where p takes potentially a long time to check while q can be verified quickly. Naturally, you should enter this as q && p . If q turns out to be false Mathematica won't bother working out p at all. This can be a great time saving. If And had the Orderless attribute the arguments p and q would have to be sorted according to the built-in sorting rules and you would loose control over the order in which this evaluation is performed. Thus the Orderless attribute would be a disadvantage in this case. In any case, it is not needed, since commutativity arises merely from the way Truth tables for And and Or work, and having the Orderless attribute would contribute nothing here. (By the way, you should not conuse the sorting out output, which Mathematica does when you apply LogicalExpand, with the sorting of the arguments.) In the case of the other two functions, Union and Interestion the explanation is similar. Again having the Orderless attribute would simply add unnecessary "prior sorting" of arguments, to the working of these functions. But in any case, these functions have to at some point sort the elements of list that you get at the output and sorting the arguments first would not, in general, help in this task. Sorting the arguments of Union or Intersection would simply add an additional computational task, which would have no effect at all on the final result! Again, in this case the commutativity comes as a by-product of the sorting of elements in the output, and not through giving the function and the Orderless attribute. Andrzej -- Andrzej Kozlowski Toyama International University JAPAN http://platon.c.u-tokyo.ac.jp/andrzej/ http://sigma.tuins.ac.jp/ on 6/19/00 2:45 PM, Drago Ganic at drago.ganic at in2.hr wrote: > Hi Mathgroup !! > > Is there any reason that the symbols > > And, > Or, > Intersection, > Union > > do not have the Orderless attribute (but do have the Flat attribute). > > > These operations are commutative (as far as I know). We can see this fo And > and Or if we use LogicalExpand > > In[1]: b && c && a > Out[1]: b && c && a > > In[2]: LogiclaExpand[%] > Out[2]: a && b && c > > Why, why ?? > > Drago Ganic > Croatia > >