[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Question on version 4 and long Pi calculations.....
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg23581] Re: Question on version 4 and long Pi calculations.....
*From*: "Atul Sharma" <atulksharma at yahoo.com>
*Date*: Sun, 21 May 2000 18:12:50 -0400 (EDT)
*Organization*: McGill University
*References*: <8fqrvb$h66@smc.vnet.net>
*Sender*: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
I apologize if this is off tangent, and I confess to be woefully ignorant on
this (and many other) subjects, but there are algorithms for calculating
digits of pi without having to calculate the intermediate digits, if that's
helpful.
I originally came across it while looking for an alternate pseudorandom
number generator.
A very nice review is available at the David Bailey's web site, where the
author describes it as
This work is an outgrowth of a 1997 result (by myself, Peter Borwein and
Simon
Plouffe) that the n-th binary digit of pi (and some other constants) is
given by a simple formula, independent of the first n-1 digits.
http://www.nersc.gov/~dhbailey
AS
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Atul Sharma MD, FRCP(C)
Pediatric Nephrologist,
McGill University/Montreal Children's Hospital
zeno at magicnet.net wrote in message <8fqrvb$h66 at smc.vnet.net>...
>I know that version 4 can calculate Pi much faster than previous
>versions..the web site though mentions "up to 10 million" places, etc. Does
>that mean the extreme speed increase is for only up to the first 10 million
>places? Or is the speed increase the same for any amount of places, and the
>only limit is ones memeory? If one had enough memory, could one calculte Pi
>to 50 milion places with a great speed increase in addition to 1 milion
>places or 10 million?
>
Prev by Date:
**Re: Mathematica course**
Next by Date:
**Re: ContourPlots,DensityPlots**
Previous by thread:
**Re: Question on version 4 and long Pi calculations.....**
Next by thread:
**multiplying a list of matrices together**
| |