|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: The 'Solving a Block Diagram in Mathematica' web page
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg23590] Re: The 'Solving a Block Diagram in Mathematica' web page
- From: Eckhard Hennig <hennig at itwm.uni-kl.de>
- Date: Sun, 21 May 2000 18:12:56 -0400 (EDT)
- Organization: ITWM
- References: <8g7272$j49@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Peltio schrieb in Nachricht <8g7272$j49 at smc.vnet.net>...
>Just for the sake of knowing...
>Is the block diagram given at:
>
>http://library.wolfram.com/howtos/block/
>(Solving a Block Diagram in Mathematica)
>
>correct? I'm not an expert of control systems, but, shouldn't the two
>lower blocks be:
>
>(4s+2)/(s^2+2s+1) instead of 4s+2/(s^2+2s+1)
>(s^2+2)/(s^2+14) instead of s^2+2/(s^2+14)
Hi Peltio,
indeed, the diagram and the calculations do not match. But even with the
above corrections, the result appears to be incorrect. I computed the
transfer function of the block diagram with Analog Insydes, and the result
is slightly different:
http://www.itwm.uni-kl.de/as/products/ai/BlockDiagram.nb
(You can run these calculations with the evaluation version of Analog
Insydes.)
>Also, is there a particular convention that allows to understand which
>node is adding and which one is subtracting?
>Or am I missing something?
Unless an input to a summing junction is explicitly marked with a minus
sign, one can assume that the input is adding. But obviously, some minus
signs have been forgotten in the diagram.
Best regards,
Eckhard
-----------------------------------------------------------
Dr.-Ing. Eckhard Hennig mailto:hennig at itwm.uni-kl.de
Institut fuer Techno- und Wirtschaftsmathematik e.V. (ITWM)
Erwin-Schroedinger-Strasse, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
Voice: +49-(0)631-205-3126 Fax: +49-(0)631-205-4139
http://www.itwm.uni-kl.de/as/employees/hennig.html
ITWM - Makers of Analog Insydes for Mathematica
http://www.itwm.uni-kl.de/as/products/ai
-----------------------------------------------------------
Prev by Date:
Re: ContourPlots,DensityPlots
Next by Date:
Re: sending notebooks as attatchments with microsoft OutlookExpress...
Previous by thread:
Re: BarChart Bug?
Next by thread:
Autosave
|