- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg25608] Re: [mg25602] limits
- From: Andrzej Kozlowski <andrzej at tuins.ac.jp>
- Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 03:04:35 -0400 (EDT)
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Personally I think you are quite right and it is an inconsistency. Strictly
speaking Limit[1/(x - 2), x -> 2] can be said to exist only when 1/(x - 2)
is viewed as a complex meromorphic function (or a holomorphic mapping from
the Riemann sphere to itself) but then the value at x=2 ought to be
ComplexInfinity and not DirectedInfinity which is what Mathematica gives.
I would consider this not so much a bug as a mathematical (or even logical)
Toyama International University, JAPAN
For Mathematica related links and resources try:
on 00.10.11 4:50 PM, Tom De Vries at tdevries at mail2.westworld.ca wrote:
> Hello all,
> Forgive the simple questions here. I'm a high school mathematics teacher
> having a go at teaching calculus so my knowledge is limited. Our class is
> using Mathematica and I was wondering about the interpretation of limits
> using Mathematica.
> Limit[1/(x - 2), x -> 2]
> gives me an answer of infinity. However, taking the limit from both
> directions shows that the limit is different coming from either side of 2.
> Limit[1/(x - 2), x -> 2, Direction -> 1]
> Limit[1/(x - 2), x -> 2, Direction -> -1]
> When I ask Mathematica to take a limit at 2, should I not expect it to give
> me an answer that would indicate that the limit does not exist since it is
> different coming from above and below?
> Thanks for any help you might provide!
> Tom De Vries
> Edmonton, Alberta
Prev by Date:
Graphics Directives Lost In Certain Cases
Next by Date:
Re: ReplaceAll in Element Q
Previous by thread:
strange problem about colors
Next by thread:
integral of Bessel function, bug in Mathematica 4.0