[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Re: Trouble with Splice for Java (i.e. there is no JForm)

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg31938] Re: Trouble with Splice for Java (i.e. there is no JForm)
• From: "Robert Nowak" <robert.nowak at ims.co.at>
• Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 01:08:42 -0500 (EST)
• References: <9uq9lu$afg$1@smc.vnet.net> <9v49e4$n0p$1@smc.vnet.net>
• Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

you forgot ToString[]

actually you need

StringReplace[ToString[CForm[ yourexpression ]],"Power"->"Math.pow"]


Regards Robert


--
---
Robert Nowak (robert.nowak at ims.co.at)
IMS Nanofabrication GmbH
A-1020 Wien, Schreygasse 3, Austria
Phone: (+43 1)2144894-32, Fax: (+43 1)2144894-99

"Albert Retey" <albert.retey at visualanalysis.com> wrote in message
news:9v49e4$n0p$1 at smc.vnet.net...
> "Matthew D. Langston" wrote:
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I can't figure out how to output Java language constructs using Splice,
like
> > I can for Fortran and C/C++ files.
> >
> > For example, here is how x^2 is represented in different languages:
> >
> > C/C++ :   Power(x,2)
> > Fortran:   x**2
> > TeX     :   x^2
> > Java     :  Math.pow(x,2)
> >
> > Since there is no JForm command in Mathematica, I have been trying to
use
> > CForm.   However, I can't figure out how to output the Java syntax.  If
I
> > try something like this:
> >
> > x^2/.Power->Math.pow
> >
> > then the CForm comes out like this:
> >
> > Dot(Math,pow)(x,2)
> >
> > If I try something like this:
> >
> > x^2/.Power->"Math.pow"
> >
> > then the CForm comes out like this:
> >
> > "Math.pow"(x,2)
> >
> > Can someone help me understand how to get x^2 to output as Math.pow(x,2)
> > please?  Thank you.
>
> StringReplace[CForm[ yourexpression ],"Power"->"Math.pow"]
>
> should do what you want. If your expression is huge and the above
> command is slow you can use any other system that can do efficient
> string replacements (e.g. perl, sed,...) for the task...
>
> An alternative would be to define your own Output Format for Power, but
> that would probably get more complicated.
>
> Hope that helps.
>
> Albert
>