Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2001
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2001

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

six-fold integral

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg30083] six-fold integral
  • From: seidov at bgumail.bgu.ac.il (Zakir F. Seidov)
  • Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 03:52:20 -0400 (EDT)
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Can anybody prove or disprove this result
 (Int_0^1\[Equal]Integral from zero to 1):

Int_0^1 Int_0^1 Int_0^1 Int_0^1 Int_0^1 Int_0^1
[(x-X)^2+(y-Y)^2+(z-Z)^2]^(-1/2) dx dy dz dX dY dZ =
(2 3^(1/2)-2^(1/2)-1)/5+pi/3 +
ln[(2^(1/2)-1)(2-3^(1/2)]?

This is a particular case 
of the general integral considered in:
arxiv:astro-ph/0002496.

The way I've got this result is 
the too lengthy interactive session
with MATHEMATICA - and IS NOT ELEGANT (though result is).

I beleive that result is correct 
but will be happy to hear from
anyone who could find the more elegant way to
prove or disprove this result.

Thanks a lot!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Also, e-mail messages are kindly welcome. 

Zakir F.Seidov
seidov at bgumail.bgu.ac.il
zfseidov at ycariel.yosh.ac.il
seidovzf at yahoo.com


  • Prev by Date: Module Slows Down after First Call?
  • Next by Date: Re: How can I superimpose two plots of different range
  • Previous by thread: Module Slows Down after First Call?
  • Next by thread: Re: six-fold integral