MathGroup Archive 2001

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Puzzled over (un)changing argument symbols in functions

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg27957] Puzzled over (un)changing argument symbols in functions
  • From: "A. E. Siegman" <siegman at stanford.edu>
  • Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 05:27:05 -0500 (EST)
  • Organization: Stanford University
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Here are three cells just to confirm that if I define a trivial function 
f1[y,z], then substitute y1 and z1 for y and z, the result is what you'd 
think it would be

      In[1] :=  f1[y_, z_] := y - z;

      In[2] := f1[y, z]

      Out[2] = y - z

      In[3] := f1[y1, z1]

      Out[3] = y1 - z1

Now I define a slightly more complex but still algebraic function  
f2[n,b] using RSolve.  For simplicity I haven't printed the Outputs 
below, but the essential result is that b  is *not* replaced by  b1  in 
Output[] -- Outputs [7] and [8] are identical:

      In[4] := << DiscreteMath`RSolve`;

      In[5] := fSoln = RSolve[ { a[n] == (2 + b)a[n - 1] - a[n - 2], 
                 a[3] == 1, a[-3] == 1},  a[n], n ]  /.  (n ? -3) ->True;

      In[6] := f2[n_, b_] := (a[n] /. fSoln[[1]]);

      In[7]:= f2[n, b]

      In[8]:= f2[n, b1]

Why doesn't  f2[n,b]  behave like  f1[y,x]  did?


  • Prev by Date: tricky question
  • Next by Date: Re: A CGE model with overlapping generations
  • Previous by thread: Re: tricky question
  • Next by thread: Re: Puzzled over (un)changing argument symbols in functions